Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- May 3, 2005, 04:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505022116080.3594@ppc970.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050503032916.GE22038@waste.org>
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > The delta is not the object I care about and its representation is > arbitrary. In fact different branches will store different deltas > depending on how their DAGs get topologically sorted. The object I > care about is the original text, so that's the hash I store.
Ok. In that case, it sounds like you're really doing everything git is doing, except your "blob" objects effectively can have pointers to a previous object (and you have a different on-disk representation)? Is that correct?
Linus