Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From
- Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2005, 04:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050503042739.GF22038@waste.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505022123270.3594@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:24:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > > On Mon, 2 May 2005, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > It's still simple in Mercurial, but more importantly Mercurial _won't > > need it_. Dropping history is a work-around, not a feature. > > Side note: this is what Larry thought about BK too. Until three years had > passed, and the ChangeSet file was many megabytes in size. Even slow > growth ends up being big growth in the end.. > > We had been talking about pruning the BK history as long back as a year > ago.
Ok, I'll implement it on my red eye flight tonight. But Mercurial won't suffer from the O(filesize) problem of BK.
-- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.