Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From
- H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2005, 20:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <426FF799.4000501@zytor.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050427190144.GA28848@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Hello, > > >>Directory hashing slows down operations that do linear sweeps through >>the filesystem reading every single file, simply because without >>dir_index, there is likely to be a correlation between inode order and >>directory order, whereas with dir_index, readdir() returns entries in >>hash order. > > > thank you for the awareness training. Than mutt should be slower, too. > Maybe I should repeat that tests. >
Only if you read every single file in each directory every time. I thought mutt did header indexing and thus didn't need to do that.
-hpa