Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From
- Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2005, 19:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200504291954.MAA27561@emf.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050429194753.GA14222@uglybox.localnet>
> Call me a naive git, but seems to me the "git way" is a little > different. It's tree-based rather than diff-based, and doesn't involve > passing diffs around, right?
Isn't that a significant part of what I said? Go back and read more carefully, is my suggestion.
> Or am I missing something?
Very much so.
-t