Re: Why doesn't `git log -m` imply `-p`?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 4, 2021, 12:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbl9q7jxf.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <87eeemhnj4.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
> That said, what do we decide about -m to finally join -c/--cc party and > start to imply -p? Last time we've discussed it, we decided that -m has > been simply overlooked when -c/--cc started to imply -p. Should we > finally fix this?
I thought I already said this, but in case I didn't, I think "--diff-merges=separate" should imply "some kind of diff", and not necessarily "-p".