Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
- From
Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 17, 2021, 20:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <875yzhf7cq.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1ra56svo.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes: > >> Fix long standing inconsistency between -c/--cc that do imply -p, on >> one side, and -m that did not imply -p, on the other side. >> ... >> Exact historical semantics of -m is still provided by >> --diff-merges=separate. >> >> Updates in v1: > > OK, so this is [v2] not v1 ;-)
I dunno. Actually, I'm a bit confused.
Is simple [PATCH] v0 or v1? For me, as C-programmer, it's obviously v0, and that's what
git format-patch --reroll-count=0 produces anyway, and the next one is
git format-patch --reroll-count=1
that produces [PATCH v1]. That's how it became v1.
> > Will replace. Thanks.
Thanks!
-- Sergey Organov