Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
- From
Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 18, 2021, 12:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87a6osb5i5.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
- In-Reply-To
- <321ca7e8-0ccb-20dd-e2de-2f3c2845e515@gmail.com>
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
Show 6 quoted lines
>> Exact historical semantics of -m is still provided by >> --diff-merges=separate. >> > > Better say "Previously, the -m semantics is same as > --diff-merges=separate".
Oops, unlike the rest of your suggestions, this one I don't get, sorry.
Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov