Re: [PATCH 4/9] t1300: remove unreasonable expectation from TODO
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> An obvious question is whether we should preserve the original
> unrealistic parts by splitting it: the realistic parts into one
> expect_failure (that we'd switch to expect_success by the end of this
> series), and then an unrealistic one to serve as a documentation of the
> ideal, with a comment explaining why it's unrealistic.
>
> I doubt the "unrealistic" half would be serving much purpose though, so
> I'm OK to see it get eliminated here.
Likewise. The series looks good so far.