Re: [PATCH 3/9] t1300: avoid relying on a bug
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2018, 12:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1803301438120.5026@qfpub.tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180329194313.GD2939@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Jeff King wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to > > be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a > > config section leaves an *empty* section behind. > > > > Let's fix this test case not to rely on that behavior, simply by > > preventing the section from becoming empty. > > Seems like a good solution. I don't think we care in particular about > testing a multi-line value at the end of the file.
... and if we did, we should have documented that.
Ciao, Dscho