From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:45:35 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] t1300: remove unreasonable expectation from TODO Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180329195218.GE2939@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > An obvious question is whether we should preserve the original > unrealistic parts by splitting it: the realistic parts into one > expect_failure (that we'd switch to expect_success by the end of this > series), and then an unrealistic one to serve as a documentation of the > ideal, with a comment explaining why it's unrealistic. > > I doubt the "unrealistic" half would be serving much purpose though, so > I'm OK to see it get eliminated here. Likewise. The series looks good so far.