Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Name for A..B ranges?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 20, 2016, 22:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4m7kc5md.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160720211007.5520-1-philipoakley@iee.org>
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> No change in the number of patches. Interdiff below. > > The patches carefully tease out the clarification of > reachability. Reachability is defined relative the ancestry chain thus > (hopefully) avoiding misunderstandings. > > The final patch updates the summary examples, and the tricky (for the > untutored reader) two dots case of a linear development where r1..r2 > excludes r1 itself.
All looked sensible and each focused on a single issue and fixing it well. Done very nicely.
Thanks. Will (re)queue, wait for a few days for further comments and let's merge it to 'next'.