From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 22:22:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Name for A..B ranges? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160720211007.5520-1-philipoakley@iee.org> Philip Oakley writes: > No change in the number of patches. Interdiff below. > > The patches carefully tease out the clarification of > reachability. Reachability is defined relative the ancestry chain thus > (hopefully) avoiding misunderstandings. > > The final patch updates the summary examples, and the tricky (for the > untutored reader) two dots case of a linear development where r1..r2 > excludes r1 itself. All looked sensible and each focused on a single issue and fixing it well. Done very nicely. Thanks. Will (re)queue, wait for a few days for further comments and let's merge it to 'next'.