Re: name for A..B ranges?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 27, 2016, 15:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4m8ed5zu.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <8001594309A04A42859024BAEB8FF188@PhilipOakley>
"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
> ..., I was wondering > if an alternative would be to refer to it via [use the headings of] > it's notation, i.e. "the 'two-dot' range notation" (or 'syntax' is > that is preferred), and the "three-dot symmetric difference notation".
That's a lot more sensible pair of headings, I would think.
> The existing explanatory text can stand as is, but they would now have > a section for readers to find. > > Or should I just drop this?
I like the approach to separate them into clearly marked sections. I primarily was reacting to the "single-sided" which nobody would understand.