Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] commit: move print_commit_summary() to libgit
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 8, 2017, 01:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4lq5oa1y.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7849f0e9-24eb-89db-3524-dffdb00d82ad@talktalk.net>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On 07/11/17 03:38, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> writes: >> >>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> >>> >>> Move print_commit_summary() from builtin/commit.c to sequencer.c so it >>> can be shared with other commands. The function is modified by >>> changing the last argument to a flag so callers can specify whether >>> they want to show the author date in addition to specifying if this is >>> an initial commit. >> >> A movement of a long function like this one really is easier if you >> did not make any other unnecessary change in the same patch and then >> made the change as a follow-up. > > I'm not sure what you mean by unnecessary, the original code called a > file-local function author_date_is_interesting().
Yes, sorry, I missed the fact that author_date_is_interesting() is not moving (and it is not moving for obvious reasons).