From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:38:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] t1300: avoid relying on a bug
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1803301438120.5026@qfpub.tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <20180329194313.GD2939@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Hi Peff,

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Jeff King wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to
> > be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a
> > config section leaves an *empty* section behind.
> > 
> > Let's fix this test case not to rely on that behavior, simply by
> > preventing the section from becoming empty.
> 
> Seems like a good solution. I don't think we care in particular about
> testing a multi-line value at the end of the file.

... and if we did, we should have documented that.

Ciao,
Dscho