Re: [PATCH/RFC/GSoC 09/17] rebase-common: implement cache_has_unstaged_changes()
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 15, 2016, 14:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1603151515030.4690@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8BOZsPcEgOLiBo4u4SAEzDVmFd_XgU3yq4P+rBGRyJx8w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Duy,
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > In my 'interactive-rebase' branch... > > 64 commits! Maybe next time we should announce wip branches like this > when we start doing stuff so people don't overlap. Of course these > branches do not have to be perfect (and can be force pushed from time > to time, even).
Much of this is cleanup in the beginning. And I tried to split out a patch I thought was uncontentious, and promptly ran into a philosophical discussion I did not seek ;-)
Ciao, Dscho