From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:15:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC/GSoC 09/17] rebase-common: implement cache_has_unstaged_changes()
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1603151515030.4690@virtualbox>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8BOZsPcEgOLiBo4u4SAEzDVmFd_XgU3yq4P+rBGRyJx8w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Duy,

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > In my 'interactive-rebase' branch...
> 
> 64 commits! Maybe next time we should announce wip branches like this
> when we start doing stuff so people don't overlap. Of course these
> branches do not have to be perfect (and can be force pushed from time
> to time, even).

Much of this is cleanup in the beginning. And I tried to split out a patch
I thought was uncontentious, and promptly ran into a philosophical
discussion I did not seek ;-)

Ciao,
Dscho