Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 8, 2013, 03:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0nbC3jfapvJKuh=m3s1n+GWfTYbhb5DWEjNrFDimQF-KA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1370643409-3431-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> sequencer.c => builtin/sequencer.c | 160 +----------------------------------- > sequencer.h => builtin/sequencer.h | 4 -
Why exactly? The plan was to unify continuation semantics, and get all the continuation-commands to use the sequencer. That clearly hasn't materialized, but I don't know what this move buys us.