Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2013, 17:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq7gi1eupf.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s1x4Dm2KwyuN=oisSFdoCPxYzu+ZjZjHN45_=i7b=z0_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> It is not bad behavior. It is bad behavior *in your opinion*,
And in essentially everyone else on this list, it seems.
> an opinion that wouldn't be shared by other projects, like the Linux > kernel.
Googling your name and LKML gives me this in the first page (addressed to you):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/12/434 "I'm stupider for just reading your email. Go away."
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/15/112 "I'll make one more try at explaining to you, but then I'll just set my mail reader to ignore you, because judging by past performance (not just in this thread) you will just continue to argue."
I don't follow the lkml so maybe I've just been unlucky and Google didn't show me an accurate sample, but arguing that your behavior is welcome on the LKML seems weird.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/