Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 9, 2013, 19:29 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3pAUi9G4BU39bMo5nJ+YyrJ0FS+UY1c5yJsu5+x0k7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALKQrgc5K0U2qCHjjzgxw1=70FbmHdokU3H0tfB_=+7gDVNzsA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> wrote:

Show 21 quoted lines

> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>>> Go back to my 261 commits, show me one that is "unmindful of technical details".
>>
>> And you say this thread is an excellent example of your point that I'm
>> unmindful of technical details?
>>
>> It's not. There are no technical details I was unmindful of in this thread.
>
> Ok, I'll bite (against my better judgment). From a related thread, a
> few minutes ago:
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file?
>> No, this patch series won't be applied.
>
> Thomas points out a technical detail with the patch series, and the
> answer given is 100% non-constructive.

Geezus!

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227109

There. Are you happy?

I dropped the patches that are not part of the series.

Who benefits from this? NOBODY. Certainly not the users.

-- 
Felipe Contreras