From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 03:35:01 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer
Message-ID: <CALkWK0nbC3jfapvJKuh=m3s1n+GWfTYbhb5DWEjNrFDimQF-KA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1370643409-3431-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>

Felipe Contreras wrote:
>  sequencer.c => builtin/sequencer.c | 160 +-----------------------------------
>  sequencer.h => builtin/sequencer.h |   4 -

Why exactly?  The plan was to unify continuation semantics, and get
all the continuation-commands to use the sequencer.  That clearly
hasn't materialized, but I don't know what this move buys us.