Re: [PATCH 5/9] Refactor excluded and path_excluded
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2012, 12:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Aq7Sodm1_k2kAmfajHG4wP76xHCshDGPfiLYfzuNwWaA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v627r7s5c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes: > >> We could introduce exclude_path() and kill path_excluded() then. There >> are just about 5-6 call sites to replace. > > The name path_excluded(... path ...) sounds like it is asking a > yes/no question "is this path excluded?", which actually is what is > going on. > > The name exclude_path(... path ...) sounds as if you are requesting > somebody to exclude the path. Does that meaning match the semantics > of the function?
I'm not great at naming. And path_excluded() cannot be reused to avoid problems with other ongoing series if any. So path_is_excluded()?
-- Duy