compiler checks
- From
Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
- Date
- Dec 16, 2012, 23:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121216230411.GA3673@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vehlv5hg8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes: > > > It has been rebased on the latest master, and passed a full test run. > > FYI, I applied the attached on top before queuing it in 'pu'. > > Points to note: > > * We match the underline and the title of documentation header; > > * a few type mismatches (constness of full_path and treat_gitlink() > signature) that broke compilation;
Of course I will incorporate these tweaks in my re-roll, but it worries me that my environment yielded no compilation issues even without these tweaks. Obviously I wouldn't have dreamed of submitting a patch series which didn't even compile! I'm using a modern gcc, and I guess you probably are too? Which would suggest to me that either your environment is somehow set up to perform stricter type checking than mine[1], or that there's a weird compiler-oriented bug somewhere (e.g. in Makefile). Or maybe I'm missing something obvious ...
[1] I'm in favour of stricter compiler checks where possible:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/211607