Re: [PATCH] doc: replace jargon word "impact" with "effect"/"affect"

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2021, 17:12 UTC
Message-ID: <60c63c70c7cbe_41f4520874@natae.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20210613162802.GG8544@kitsune.suse.cz>

Michal Suchánek wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 09:06:40AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Michal Suchánek wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

> > > We already received such reviews as response to your patch. It's not
> > > what-if.
> > 
> > In case you haven't been following this thread closely, you are the only
> > person that says the use of "impact" is OK. One person said "impact" was
> 
> Apparently you have not followed this thread closely yourself.

I have. If you think you have, then list all the people that agree with you that there's no problem with "impact" for the general population.

> > It's OK to merge patches where one person objects.
> 
> Apprantly you also missed that I am not opposed to the patch.

Good. So some people are in favor of the patch, and nobody is against it.

-- 
Felipe Contreras