From: Felipe Contreras Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:12:16 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: replace jargon word "impact" with "effect"/"affect" Message-ID: <60c63c70c7cbe_41f4520874@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <20210613162802.GG8544@kitsune.suse.cz> Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 09:06:40AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > We already received such reviews as response to your patch. It's not > > > what-if. > > > > In case you haven't been following this thread closely, you are the only > > person that says the use of "impact" is OK. One person said "impact" was > > Apparently you have not followed this thread closely yourself. I have. If you think you have, then list all the people that agree with you that there's no problem with "impact" for the general population. > > It's OK to merge patches where one person objects. > > Apprantly you also missed that I am not opposed to the patch. Good. So some people are in favor of the patch, and nobody is against it. -- Felipe Contreras