git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodules

From
JTJonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Date
Feb 25, 2022, 00:39 UTC
Message-ID
<20220225003928.2891685-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
In-Reply-To
<20220224100842.95827-10-chooglen@google.com>
Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> writes:
Show 25 quoted lines
> In the process of writing the new tests [1], I noticed some failures of
> the form:
> 
>   # rm the submodule's working tree directory.
>   $ git rm submodule
>   [...]
> 
>   # Do a fetch that requires running a child process from the submodule.
>   $ git fetch --recurse-submodules same-name-1 
>   [...]
> 
>   # Fatal error tells us that we cannot chdir to the deleted working
>     tree.
>   fatal: cannot chdir to '../../../submodule': No such file or directory
> 
> This happens because submodules set/unset a value for core.worktree when
> they are checked out/"un-checked out" (see submodule_move_head() and
> connect_work_tree_and_git_dir()), but "git rm" doesn't know that
> core.worktree should be updated.
> 
> I've worked around this by passing "--work-tree=." to the child process
> [2], but this feels like a hack, especially because this bug should
> affect all child processes in a "git rm"-ed submodule (this probably
> includes the "git branch" processes in gc/branch-recurse-submodules, but
> I haven't confirmed it yet). 
Ah...that's a tricky bug. Thanks for finding it.
Show 6 quoted lines
> Some more comprehensive solutions that
> could be future work are:
> 
> - Teach "git [add|rm]" to unset core.worktree (the reverse operation,
>   "git restore", should already do the correct thing). This won't detect
>   submodules removed with "rm -r" though.
This might work with the caveat you mentioned.
> - Teach submodule child processes to ignore stale core.worktree values.

This might work, coupled with Emily Shaffer's work on teaching submodules to know that they're submodules (so we know when a stale core.worktree can be safely ignored).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220203215914.683922-1-emilyshaffer@google.com/
> - Do more things in-core instead of using child processes (avoiding the
>   failing chdir() call).

This might not work if the invocation needs to check the worktree (for example, as far as I know, we won't delete a branch if it's currently checked out in a worktree).

> I'm not sure what future work we should pursue, or even if the
> "--work-tree=." workaround is even good, so I'd appreciate feedback
> here.

I can't think of better solutions than what you listed, unfortunately. I also can't think of a better workaround, but at least it's narrowly scoped: we know that we're running on a submodule and that the operation is not affected by a worktree (for example, we're fetching, but we know we're not fetching with a refspec that updates a currently checked out branch). Let's see what others have to say.

Show 6 quoted lines
> @@ -865,6 +876,8 @@ static void collect_changed_submodules_cb(struct diff_queue_struct *q,
>  		if (!item->util)
>  			item->util = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct changed_submodule_data));
>  		cs_data = item->util;
> +		cs_data->super_oid = commit_oid;
> +		cs_data->path = xstrdup(p->two->path);

Junio mentioned the possibility of cs_data->path already being non-NULL [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy220j6kf.fsf@gitster.g/
Show 21 quoted lines
> @@ -1253,14 +1266,33 @@ void check_for_new_submodule_commits(struct object_id *oid)
>  	oid_array_append(&ref_tips_after_fetch, oid);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Returns 1 if there is at least one submodule gitdir in
> + * $GIT_DIR/modules and 0 otherwise. This follows
> + * submodule_name_to_gitdir(), which looks for submodules in
> + * $GIT_DIR/modules, not $GIT_COMMON_DIR.
> + *
> + * A submodule can be moved to $GIT_DIR/modules manually by running "git
> + * submodule absorbgitdirs", or it may be initialized there by "git
> + * submodule update".
> + */
> +static int repo_has_absorbed_submodules(struct repository *r)
> +{
> +	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	strbuf_repo_git_path(&buf, r, "modules/");
> +	return file_exists(buf.buf) && !is_empty_dir(buf.buf);
> +}
buf needs to be released?
Show 10 quoted lines
> @@ -1333,7 +1365,8 @@ int submodule_touches_in_range(struct repository *r,
>  }
>  
>  struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
> -	int count;
> +	int index_count;
> +	int changed_count;
>  	struct strvec args;
>  	struct repository *r;
>  	const char *prefix;

If we're sticking with these names, probably worth a comment. E.g. "index_count" is the number of submodules in <name of field that this is an index of> that we have processed, and likewise for "changed_count".

Show 8 quoted lines
> @@ -1343,6 +1376,7 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
>  	int result;
>  
>  	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
> +	struct string_list seen_submodule_names;
>  
>  	/* Pending fetches by OIDs */
>  	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;

Also here - changed is the list that we generated from walking the fetched superproject commits, and seen is the list of submodules we've processed in <name of function>.

> @@ -1539,11 +1582,64 @@ get_fetch_task(struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf, struct strbuf *err)
[snip]
Show 12 quoted lines
> +		/*
> +		 * NEEDSWORK: A submodule unpopulated by "git rm" will
> +		 * have core.worktree set, but the actual core.worktree
> +		 * directory won't exist, causing the child process to
> +		 * fail. Forcibly set --work-tree until we get smarter
> +		 * handling for core.worktree in unpopulated submodules.
> +		 */
> +		strvec_push(&task->git_args, "--work-tree=.");
> +		return task;
> +	}
> +	return NULL;
> +}

If we end up sticking to this workaround (which sounds reasonable to me), the comment here probably should contain a lot of what was written under the "---" in the commit message.

> +test_expect_success "'--recurse-submodules=on-demand' should fetch submodule commits if the submodule is changed but the index has no submodules" '
[snip]
Show 27 quoted lines
> +# In downstream, init "submodule2", but do not check it out while
> +# fetching. This lets us assert that unpopulated submodules can be
> +# fetched.
> +test_expect_success 'setup downstream branch with other submodule' '
> +	mkdir submodule2 &&
> +	(
> +		cd submodule2 &&
> +		git init &&
> +		echo sub2content >sub2file &&
> +		git add sub2file &&
> +		git commit -a -m new &&
> +		git branch -M sub2
> +	) &&
> +	git checkout -b super-sub2-only &&
> +	git submodule add "$pwd/submodule2" submodule2 &&
> +	git commit -m "add sub2" &&
> +	git checkout super &&
> +	(
> +		cd downstream &&
> +		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin &&
> +		git checkout super-sub2-only &&
> +		# Explicitly run "git submodule update" because sub2 is new
> +		# and has not been cloned.
> +		git submodule update --init &&
> +		git checkout --recurse-submodules super
> +	)
> +'

Hmm...what is the difference between this and the original case in which the index has no submodules? Both assert that unpopulated submodules (submodules that cannot be found by iterating the index, as described in your commit message) can be fetched.

Show 20 quoted lines
> +	# Use test_cmp manually because verify_fetch_result does not
> +	# consider submodule2. All the repos should be fetched, but only
> +	# submodule2 should be read from a commit
> +	cat <<-EOF > expect.err.combined &&
> +	From $pwd/.
> +	   OLD_HEAD..$super_head  super           -> origin/super
> +	   OLD_HEAD..$super_sub2_only_head  super-sub2-only -> origin/super-sub2-only
> +	Fetching submodule submodule
> +	From $pwd/submodule
> +	   OLD_HEAD..$sub_head  sub        -> origin/sub
> +	Fetching submodule submodule/subdir/deepsubmodule
> +	From $pwd/deepsubmodule
> +	   OLD_HEAD..$deep_head  deep       -> origin/deep
> +	Fetching submodule submodule2 at commit $super_sub2_only_head
> +	From $pwd/submodule2
> +	   OLD_HEAD..$sub2_head  sub2       -> origin/sub2
> +	EOF
> +	sed -E "s/[0-9a-f]+\.\./OLD_HEAD\.\./" actual.err >actual.err.cmp &&
> +	test_cmp expect.err.combined actual.err.cmp
> +'

Could verify_fetch_result be modified to consider the new submodule instead?

Show 21 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success 'fetch --recurse-submodules updates name-conflicted, populated submodule' '
> +	test_when_finished "git -C same-name-downstream checkout master" &&
> +	(
> +		cd same-name-1 &&
> +		test_commit -C submodule --no-tag b1 &&
> +		git add submodule &&
> +		git commit -m "super-b1"
> +	) &&
> +	(
> +		cd same-name-2 &&
> +		test_commit -C submodule --no-tag b2 &&
> +		git add submodule &&
> +		git commit -m "super-b2"
> +	) &&
> +	(
> +		cd same-name-downstream &&
> +		# even though the .gitmodules is correct, we cannot
> +		# fetch from same-name-2
> +		git checkout same-name-2/master &&
> +		git fetch --recurse-submodules same-name-1 &&
> +		test_must_fail git fetch --recurse-submodules same-name-2

What's the error message printed to the user here? (Just from reading the code, I would have expected this to succeed, with the submodule fetch being from same-name-1's submodule since we're fetching submodules by name, but apparently that is not the case.)

Show 7 quoted lines
> +	(
> +		cd same-name-downstream/.git/modules/submodule &&
> +		# The submodule has core.worktree pointing to the "git
> +		# rm"-ed directory, overwrite the invalid value.
> +		git --work-tree=. cat-file -e $head1 &&
> +		test_must_fail git --work-tree=. cat-file -e $head2
> +	)

Regarding the worktree workaround, also say "see comment in get_fetch_task() for more information" or something like that.

Previous: Glen ChooNext: Glen Choo
Message 92 of 149 in “fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodules”
  1. 0/8 fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  2. 1/8 submodule: inline submodule_commits() into callerGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  3. 2/8 submodule: store new submodule commits oid_array in a structGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  4. Jonathan TanFeb 10, 2022
  5. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2022
  6. 4/8 t5526: introduce test helper to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  7. 3/8 submodule: make static functions read submodules from commitsGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  8. Jonathan TanFeb 10, 2022
  9. Glen ChooFeb 11, 2022
  10. Glen ChooFeb 11, 2022
  11. 5/8 t5526: use grep to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  12. Jonathan TanFeb 10, 2022
  13. 6/8 submodule: extract get_fetch_task()Glen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  14. Jonathan TanFeb 10, 2022
  15. 7/8 fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  16. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2022
  17. Glen ChooFeb 11, 2022
  18. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2022
  19. Jonathan TanFeb 10, 2022
  20. Glen ChooFeb 14, 2022
  21. Glen ChooFeb 14, 2022
  22. Glen ChooFeb 14, 2022
  23. 8/8 submodule: fix bug and remove add_submodule_odb()Glen Choo, Feb 10, 2022
  24. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2022
  25. Glen ChooFeb 11, 2022
  26. Jonathan TanFeb 10, 2022
  27. Glen ChooFeb 11, 2022
  28. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2022
  29. Glen ChooFeb 14, 2022
  30. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2022
  31. Glen ChooFeb 10, 2022
  32. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2022
  33. Glen ChooFeb 11, 2022
  34. 0/9 fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  35. 1/9 t5526: introduce test helper to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  36. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 15, 2022
  37. 2/9 t5526: use grep to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  38. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 15, 2022
  39. Glen ChooFeb 16, 2022
  40. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 16, 2022
  41. Glen ChooFeb 17, 2022
  42. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 17, 2022
  43. Glen ChooFeb 17, 2022
  44. 3/9 submodule: make static functions read submodules from commitsGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  45. Jonathan TanFeb 15, 2022
  46. Glen ChooFeb 16, 2022
  47. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 15, 2022
  48. Glen ChooFeb 16, 2022
  49. 4/9 submodule: inline submodule_commits() into callerGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  50. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 15, 2022
  51. 5/9 submodule: store new submodule commits oid_array in a structGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  52. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 15, 2022
  53. 6/9 submodule: extract get_fetch_task()Glen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  54. 7/9 fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  55. Jonathan TanFeb 15, 2022
  56. Glen ChooFeb 16, 2022
  57. Glen ChooFeb 16, 2022
  58. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 16, 2022
  59. Glen ChooFeb 16, 2022
  60. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 15, 2022
  61. 8/9 submodule: read shallows when finding changed submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  62. Jonathan TanFeb 15, 2022
  63. 9/9 submodule: fix latent check_has_commit() bugGlen Choo, Feb 15, 2022
  64. Jonathan TanFeb 15, 2022
  65. 00/10 fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  66. 01/10 t5526: introduce test helper to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  67. Junio C HamanoFeb 25, 2022
  68. 02/10 t5526: stop asserting on stderr literallyGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  69. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 24, 2022
  70. Glen ChooFeb 24, 2022
  71. Eric SunshineFeb 24, 2022
  72. Jonathan TanFeb 24, 2022
  73. Glen ChooFeb 25, 2022
  74. 04/10 submodule: make static functions read submodules from commitsGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  75. 03/10 t5526: create superproject commits with test helperGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  76. Jonathan TanFeb 24, 2022
  77. Glen ChooFeb 25, 2022
  78. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 25, 2022
  79. Glen ChooFeb 28, 2022
  80. 05/10 submodule: inline submodule_commits() into callerGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  81. 06/10 submodule: store new submodule commits oid_array in a structGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  82. 07/10 submodule: extract get_fetch_task()Glen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  83. Jonathan TanFeb 24, 2022
  84. 08/10 submodule: move logic into fetch_task_create()Glen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  85. Jonathan TanFeb 24, 2022
  86. 10/10 submodule: fix latent check_has_commit() bugGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  87. 09/10 fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodulesGlen Choo, Feb 24, 2022
  88. Junio C HamanoFeb 24, 2022
  89. Glen ChooFeb 25, 2022
  90. Junio C HamanoFeb 25, 2022
  91. Glen ChooFeb 25, 2022
  92. Jonathan TanFeb 25, 2022
  93. Glen ChooFeb 25, 2022
  94. Jonathan TanMar 4, 2022
  95. Glen ChooMar 5, 2022
  96. Jonathan TanMar 4, 2022
  97. Junio C HamanoFeb 26, 2022
  98. Johannes SchindelinMar 1, 2022
  99. Junio C HamanoMar 1, 2022
  100. Glen ChooMar 2, 2022
  101. Junio C HamanoMar 1, 2022
  102. 00/10 fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodulesGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  103. 01/10 t5526: introduce test helper to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  104. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  105. Glen ChooMar 4, 2022
  106. 02/10 t5526: stop asserting on stderr literallyGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  107. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  108. Jonathan TanMar 4, 2022
  109. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  110. Glen ChooMar 5, 2022
  111. 03/10 t5526: create superproject commits with test helperGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  112. Jonathan TanMar 4, 2022
  113. 04/10 submodule: make static functions read submodules from commitsGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  114. 05/10 submodule: inline submodule_commits() into callerGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  115. 06/10 submodule: store new submodule commits oid_array in a structGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  116. 07/10 submodule: extract get_fetch_task()Glen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  117. 09/10 fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodulesGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  118. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  119. Glen ChooMar 4, 2022
  120. Junio C HamanoMar 5, 2022
  121. Glen ChooMar 5, 2022
  122. Junio C HamanoMar 8, 2022
  123. Jonathan TanMar 4, 2022
  124. 10/10 submodule: fix latent check_has_commit() bugGlen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  125. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  126. 08/10 submodule: move logic into fetch_task_create()Glen Choo, Mar 4, 2022
  127. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  128. 00/10 fetch --recurse-submodules: fetch unpopulated submodulesGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  129. 01/10 t5526: introduce test helper to assert on fetchesGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  130. 03/10 t5526: create superproject commits with test helperGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  131. 02/10 t5526: stop asserting on stderr literallyGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  132. 04/10 submodule: make static functions read submodules from commitsGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  133. 05/10 submodule: inline submodule_commits() into callerGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  134. 09/10 fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodulesGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  135. 10/10 submodule: fix latent check_has_commit() bugGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  136. 08/10 submodule: move logic into fetch_task_create()Glen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  137. 06/10 submodule: store new submodule commits oid_array in a structGlen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  138. 07/10 submodule: extract get_fetch_task()Glen Choo, Mar 8, 2022
  139. Junio C HamanoMar 8, 2022
  140. Glen ChooMar 8, 2022
  141. Junio C HamanoMar 9, 2022
  142. Glen ChooMar 9, 2022
  143. Junio C HamanoMar 9, 2022
  144. Glen ChooMar 9, 2022
  145. Glen ChooMar 16, 2022
  146. Junio C HamanoMar 16, 2022
  147. Glen ChooMar 16, 2022
  148. Junio C HamanoMar 16, 2022
  149. Jonathan TanMar 8, 2022

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.