Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] list_objects_filter_options: introduce 'list_object_filter_config_name'

From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date: Mar 18, 2020, 21:05 UTC
Message-ID: <20200318210538.GA31397@syl.local>
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTVtv+uzzpoZ-BT=F=srdt1ewvgeBAAr9R+OUCYSov65A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Eric,

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:53:44PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:40 PM Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> wrote:
> > In a subsequent commit, we will add configuration options that are
> > specific to each kind of object filter, in which case it is handy to
> > have a function that translates between 'enum
> > list_objects_filter_choice' and an appropriate configuration-friendly
> > string.
> > ---
>
> Missing sign-off (but perhaps that's intentional since this is RFC).

Yes, the missing sign-off (in this patch as well as 2/2) is intentional, since this is an RFC. Sorry for not calling this out more clearly in my cover.

Thanks, Taylor