Re: [TOPIC 16/17] “I want a reviewer”

From: Eric Wong <e@yhbt.net>
Date: Mar 13, 2020, 21:25 UTC
Message-ID: <20200313212531.GA22502@dcvr>
In-Reply-To: <6DAC1E49-9CA0-4074-867E-F22CD26C9FEB@jramsay.com.au>

James Ramsay <james@jramsay.com.au> wrote:

James: first off, thank you for these accessible summaries for
non-JS users and those who could not attend for various reasons(*)

<snip>

Show 8 quoted lines

> 6. Peff: this is all possible on the mailing list. I see things that look
> interesting, and have a to do folder. If someone replies, I’ll take it off
> the list. Once a week go through all the items. I like the book club idea,
> instead of it being ad hoc, or by me, a group of a few people review the
> list in the queue. You might want to use a separate tool, like IRC, but it
> would be good to have it bring it back to the mailing list as a summary.
> Public inbox could be better, but someone needs to write it. Maybe nerd
> snipe Eric?

What now? :o

There's a lot of things it could be better at, but a more concrete idea of what you want would help.

Right now I only have enough resources to do bugfixes along with scalability and performance improvements so more people can run it and keep it 100% reproducible and centralization resistant.

I'm also planning on some local tooling along the lines of notmuch/mairix which is NNTP/HTTPS-aware but not sure when I'll be able to do that...

(*) I stopped attending events over a decade ago for privacy reasons
    (facial recognition, invasive airport searches, etc.)