Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 17, 2012, 07:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120417073653.GB20017@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s3OSepH_XpCcTWLN=bF0+P9fmHtyPnWdQnEocW25jHTpA@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> You are the one who brought the argument that even public functions > have the '_' prefix, so it's *your* responsibility to substantiate > that argument.
No, honestly it isn't my responsibility to waste time arguing with you. What kind of crazy world would work that way?
And I did not mean to bring up any argument. I only meant to bring up the _datum_ that, at least in the context of the bash_completion project, that is the current convention. And then you started trying to tell me that I had the facts wrong! You might even be right, but you haven't shown any sign of trying to check that, by, say, asking someone from the bash_completion project what convention they use.
I'm sick of this. Call it whatever you want. I don't know why you think this is productive.
Still annoyed, Jonathan