From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:36:53 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper Message-ID: <20120417073653.GB20017@burratino> In-Reply-To: Felipe Contreras wrote: > You are the one who brought the argument that even public functions > have the '_' prefix, so it's *your* responsibility to substantiate > that argument. No, honestly it isn't my responsibility to waste time arguing with you. What kind of crazy world would work that way? And I did not mean to bring up any argument. I only meant to bring up the _datum_ that, at least in the context of the bash_completion project, that is the current convention. And then you started trying to tell me that I had the facts wrong! You might even be right, but you haven't shown any sign of trying to check that, by, say, asking someone from the bash_completion project what convention they use. I'm sick of this. Call it whatever you want. I don't know why you think this is productive. Still annoyed, Jonathan