Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 17, 2012, 08:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120417082256.GA20240@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s3mnnhKXHUEMSX+d2L2Jyqr9_Q7F=3DvWb4MKxHpTRREg@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I took your argument seriously and looked for evidence myself, and in > the absence of evidence I'm still not throwing it away, I'm assuming > it has merit and added code to make sure we don't override some user > function that has the same name. That would solve the problem you > raised
Ah. All that talking, but I was not addressing your actual point.
I though you didn't believe that the namespace adopted by the bash_completion project was "identifiers starting with underscore, plus a few old identifiers that have been grandfathered in".
But in fact, you just don't like namespace conventions.
Now I'm exhausted so I have no time to explain why a project that involves implicitly including scripts from a wide variety of authors into a flat namespace shared with others might end up using a convention to manage that namespace. But at least the world seems a little saner. Sorry for the wasted time.
Please, next time just say what you mean instead of leaving me talking about something irrelevant.