Re: [PATCH 2/8] revert: decouple sequencer actions from builtin commands
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2012, 16:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120111164758.GD1891@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0=gvsvqk7Th7YY_eRzb+Ri52AZbOVokC98i9BXVAJOZEw@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> More than the pain of rebasing the patch everytime, I guess what I'm > asking is: is it worth stretching my foresight like this? Once the > code is in sequencer.c, it just becomes so much easier for me to write > scratch code to help me wrap my head around the generalization.
In that case, why not just a patch to move the code to sequencer.c, with whatever is the minimum of related fixes (just namespace stuff, I'd imagine) before it?