Re: [PATCH 3/6] revert: don't let revert continue a cherry-pick
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2012, 20:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120108204539.GO1942@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0kwbzXRyFf=JjfAW9yD7M_FTB80+q1UPOCv-Em4qO2RKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> In retrospect, I think we should simply drop > this patch.
Great --- I don't think it had much to do with this series.
I'll keep this mail in my inbox. Who knows --- maybe I'll get a moment to teach conflicted single-picks to write a .git/sequencer/when-continuing-just-continue-the-single-pick file.