Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 15, 2009, 04:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091015042159.GA21701@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910142237010.20122@xanadu.home>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:08:59PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> IMHO this patch proposed by Daniel about the detached head is probably a > good compromise. It makes "confusing" operations more verbose to give > new users a better feeling while keeping the flexibility intact. And > increased verbosity is less annoying than decreased flexibility.
And I don't think there is as much opposition to a config option to silence verbosity, because it isn't really a change in behavior. We already have advice.*, and if the new message is too annoying, we can get advice.commitDetachedHead.
-Peff