Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was
- From
- Eric Raible <raible@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2009, 23:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <loom.20091015T013728-831@post.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7huxbtbk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster <at> pobox.com> writes:
> It won't help to alleviate my irritation if I need to give -f to each and > every invocation of "git commit" while detached, though.
I'm missing something fundamental here, I think. I simply don't see the advantage of branching after committing over branching before committing.
At worst, a temporary is cheap, eh? So what is the value of even allowing committing while HEAD is detached (aside from the historical argument)?