From: Jeff King Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:21:59 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was Message-ID: <20091015042159.GA21701@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:08:59PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > IMHO this patch proposed by Daniel about the detached head is probably a > good compromise. It makes "confusing" operations more verbose to give > new users a better feeling while keeping the flexibility intact. And > increased verbosity is less annoying than decreased flexibility. And I don't think there is as much opposition to a config option to silence verbosity, because it isn't really a change in behavior. We already have advice.*, and if the new message is too annoying, we can get advice.commitDetachedHead. -Peff