Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept
- From
- Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2008, 15:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200802091654.20473.kendy@suse.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802082151570.11591@racer.site>
Hi Johannes,
One more 'thank you' for the review - now publically :-)
On Friday 08 February 2008 22:52, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > > <bikeshedding>maybe remote-alternates (note the dash instead > > > of the underscore)</bikeshedding> > > > > Why not in info/alternates? > > Again, to make the distinction clear.
Yes; still even though the 'alteranates' and 'remote alternates' have some of the ideas common, the implementation differs (and has to differ) - so I think you are right even in the --lazy option for clone instead of reusing -s.
For the rest - I'll post the updated patch ASAP.
Regards, Jan