Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2008, 20:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m3y79nb8xk.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802141917420.30505@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Finally! > > I updated to newest git+patches (git version 1.5.4.1.1353.g0d5dd), reset > windowMemory to 512m and restarted the process:
Show 11 quoted lines
> A little over 6 hours, with one core (of the four available). Not bad, I > say. > > The result is: > > $ ls -la objects/pack/pack-e4dc6da0a10888ec4345490575efc587b7523b45.pack > -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1638490531 2008-02-14 17:51 > objects/pack/pack-e4dc6da0a10888ec4345490575efc587b7523b45.pack > > 1.6G looks much better than 2.4G, wouldn't you say? Jan, if you want it, > please give me a place to upload it to.
Brandon Casey wrote:
> I have successfully repacked this repo a few times on a 2.1GHz > system with 16G. > > The smallest attained pack was about 1.45G (1556569742B).
Do you perchance know why OOo needs so large pack? Perhaps you could try running contrib/stats/packinfo.pl on this pack to examine it to get to know what takes most space.
What is the size of checkout, by the way?
Hmmm... I wonder if packv4 would help...
-- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git