From: Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:54:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept
Message-ID: <200802091654.20473.kendy@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802082151570.11591@racer.site>

Hi Johannes,

One more 'thank you' for the review - now publically :-)

On Friday 08 February 2008 22:52, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> > > <bikeshedding>maybe remote-alternates (note the dash instead
> > > of the underscore)</bikeshedding>
> >
> > Why not in info/alternates?
>
> Again, to make the distinction clear.

Yes; still even though the 'alteranates' and 'remote alternates' have some of 
the ideas common, the implementation differs (and has to differ) - so I think 
you are right even in the --lazy option for clone instead of reusing -s.

For the rest - I'll post the updated patch ASAP.

Regards,
Jan