Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 10, 2008, 12:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802101207330.11591@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <e5bfff550802092323u3ec3c9c8uf6e92399395efd27@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Marco Costalba wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Linux git repository is not very big and can be downloaded with easy. On > the other end Linux history spans many more years then the repo does. > > The design choice here is two have *two repositories*, one with recent > stuff and one historical, with stuff older then version 2.6.12
I do not think that this is an option: Jan already tried a shallow clone (which would amount to something like what you propose), and it was still too large.
Ciao, Dscho