Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept
- From
David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 10, 2008, 16:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ee77f5c20802100846g10937a49m4901f88a70a6de0@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802101207330.11591@racer.site>
On Feb 10, 2008 4:08 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Marco Costalba wrote: > > > Linux git repository is not very big and can be downloaded with easy. On > > the other end Linux history spans many more years then the repo does. > > > > The design choice here is two have *two repositories*, one with recent > > stuff and one historical, with stuff older then version 2.6.12 > > I do not think that this is an option: Jan already tried a shallow clone > (which would amount to something like what you propose), and it was still > too large.
I think that was still pulling all the branches, so a shallow clone of just a couple of branches might be feasible.
Dave.