Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Feb 15, 2008, 01:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802142032030.2732@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802150007480.30505@racer.site>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brian Downing wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:38:24PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Heh. I was too lazy to look up the usage, so I just did what I > > > thought would make sense... > > > > > > So here it goes: > > > > > > $ git verify-pack -v > > > objects/pack/pack-e4dc6da0a10888ec4345490575efc587b7523b45.pack | > > > ~/git/contrib/stats/packinfo.pl | tee packinfo.txt > > > all sizes: count 601473 total 2855826280 min 0 max 62173032 mean > > > 4748.05 median 232 std_dev 221254.37 > > > all path sizes: count 601473 total 2855826280 min 0 max 62173032 mean > > > 4748.05 median 232 std_dev 221254.37 > > > tree sizes: count 601473 total 2855826280 min 0 max 62173032 mean > > > 4748.05 median 232 std_dev 221254.37 tree path sizes: count 601473 > > > total 2855826280 min 0 max 62173032 mean 4748.05 median 232 std_dev > > > 221254.37 > > > depths: count 2477715 total 70336238 min 0 max 250 mean 28.39 > > > median 4 std_dev 55.49 > > > > > > Something in my gut tells me that those four repetitive lines are not > > > meant to look like they do... > > > > Do you by chance have repack.usedeltabaseoffset turned on? > > Ouch. That must have been a leftover from earlier attempts. I did not > _mean_ to keep it, but now that I have a pretty packed repository, I think > I'll just keep it as-is.
I should really come around to fixing packed_object_info_detail() for the OBJ_OFS_DELTA case one day.
Nicolas