Re: [PATCH 5/9] xdiff: split xrecord_t.ha into line_hash and minimal_perfect_hash
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2025, 05:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqv7k8yh45.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAH=ZcbAjX=V_VvJsRzvQEA+CMM7dWQx6E5=d4FL5CD3s+ozjBg@mail.gmail.com>
Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm a bit surprised that nobody has commented on this patch. I thought > that someone would have criticized the length of the name > "minimal_perfect_hash" or asked me why I was splitting one field into > two.
Sometimes there aren't enough round tuits to go around, and when people have been too busy to review it, we see no comment, either positive ones or negative ones.
> I don't see any reason why this patch series shouldn't move forward.
A patch series needs a positive reason to move forward; unfortunately we cannot tell much from lack of negative comments.