From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 05:10:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xdiff: split xrecord_t.ha into line_hash and minimal_perfect_hash
Message-ID: <xmqqv7k8yh45.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAH=ZcbAjX=V_VvJsRzvQEA+CMM7dWQx6E5=d4FL5CD3s+ozjBg@mail.gmail.com>

Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm a bit surprised that nobody has commented on this patch. I thought
> that someone would have criticized the length of the name
> "minimal_perfect_hash" or asked me why I was splitting one field into
> two.

Sometimes there aren't enough round tuits to go around, and when
people have been too busy to review it, we see no comment, either
positive ones or negative ones.

> I don't see any reason why this patch series shouldn't move forward.

A patch series needs a positive reason to move forward;
unfortunately we cannot tell much from lack of negative comments.