Re: Re* [PATCH 0/4] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 5)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Apr 29, 2020, 22:36 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqsggludg6.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200429214906.GA12075@syl.local>

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

Show 5 quoted lines

> Hmm. I say this as somebody who just re-rolled a series to add two
> 'test_might_fail umask 022' lines, so am a little disappointed to learn
> that this is not considered to be idiomatic.
> ...
> Junio: do you want another reroll of that series? :/

The one I saw and remember was two new umask calls protected in POSIXPERM prerequisite but without test-might-fail involved.

Perhaps there is nothing to reroll? Or perhaps I am not checking my mailbox often enough?

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.