From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 22:36:25 GMT
Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH 0/4] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 5)
Message-ID: <xmqqsggludg6.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200429214906.GA12075@syl.local>

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

> Hmm. I say this as somebody who just re-rolled a series to add two
> 'test_might_fail umask 022' lines, so am a little disappointed to learn
> that this is not considered to be idiomatic.
> ...
> Junio: do you want another reroll of that series? :/

The one I saw and remember was two new umask calls protected in POSIXPERM
prerequisite but without test-might-fail involved.

Perhaps there is nothing to reroll?  Or perhaps I am not checking my
mailbox often enough?