Re: [PATCH 3/5] t3200: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 21, 2020, 21:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk0wmes8g.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2009201739250.5061@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: >> > >> > > I'm on the fence on whether this matters. It's a temporary >> > > inconsistency, assuming we eventually move to "main" as the default. >> > > We _could_ push this change off to that patch, too, but it does make >> > > it more noisy. >> > ... > However, in this instance, I think it makes more sense to use a separate > name altogether. I settled for using `topic` instead of `main2`, and > `new-topic` instead of `main3` locally.
I think that is sensible. Configuration does not have to be used as an escape hatch to make 'main2' less awkward---if we can avoid 'main2' (or 'master2'), that would be sufficient.