From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:26:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] t3200: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
Message-ID: <xmqqk0wmes8g.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2009201739250.5061@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

>> > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> >
>> > > I'm on the fence on whether this matters. It's a temporary
>> > > inconsistency, assuming we eventually move to "main" as the default.
>> > > We _could_ push this change off to that patch, too, but it does make
>> > > it more noisy.
>> > ...
> However, in this instance, I think it makes more sense to use a separate
> name altogether. I settled for using `topic` instead of `main2`, and
> `new-topic` instead of `main3` locally.

I think that is sensible.  Configuration does not have to be used as
an escape hatch to make 'main2' less awkward---if we can avoid
'main2' (or 'master2'), that would be sufficient.