Re: [PATCH 2/5] t/test-terminal: avoid non-inclusive language
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 20, 2020, 15:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2009201733510.5061@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqo8m5v2g9.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > > > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> > > writes: > > > >> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > >> > >> In the ongoing effort to make the Git project a more inclusive place, > >> let's try to avoid names like "master" where possible. > > > > The two sides of a PTY are called 'master' and 'slave', and I > > understand there is a push to move away from these words, but > > calling one side with an invented name that is used by nobody else > > in the context of talking about PTY, while keeping the word used to > > call the other side, would lead to confusion. > > > > A better change is to drop "master_" altogether without replacing > > the word with anything, and call them just "input", "output" and > > "error". > > If we really want to use a replacement word for 'master' instead of > just dropping, I may be inclined to suggest 'parent', in the hope > that PTY implementors will start following what Python folks are > doing, at which time they will give us a synonym for 'slave' method > called 'child' we can use.
Good idea!
Thanks, Dscho