Re: [RFC/PATCH 10/11] branch.c: use 'ref-filter' APIs
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2015, 15:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq3807gdp0.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOLa=ZR6Cu_AgB4sOBX3Tf_M0w8XN57ej8d_fZo+h7pwFDZs+A@mail.gmail.com>
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy > <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >> >> I'm not sure what's the convention, but I think the test description >> should give the expected behavior even with test_expect_failure. >> >> And please help the reviewers by saying what's the status wrt this test >> (any plan on how to fix it?). >> > > On the other hand I wonder if the test is even needed as, we don't > really need it > Cause we remove that ability of branch.c by using filter_refs().
Please read d0f810f (refs.c: allow listing and deleting badly named refs, 2014-09-03). I think the reasoning makes sense, and we should keep this ability.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/